olympus 35 sp

I remember when I was first searching for a good 35mm rangefinder, there came a point when it was between this one and the Canonet GIII Q17.  Goodness knows how many hours I spent watching YouTube videos and reading forum reviews, but I never did get my hands on either, until now.

The Olympus 35 SP that I found is in near-mint condition.  In my excitement I popped in the usual Agfa 200 film and headed outdoors to snap some photos before even bothering to familiarise myself with the camera first.  Besides, I'd shot so many rolls with its siblings the Olympus 35 RC and Olympus 35 RD, it's pretty much second nature to me now.  Boy, was I wrong.

Straight away I couldn't understand what the heck I was looking at when I looked through the viewfinder.  The RD, and even better, the RC spoils you with speed/aperture information in an easy to understand way.  What I could see in the SP were a bunch of numbers I was sure meant something, just not to me.  I went ahead and snapped some frames of nothing in full manual mode before returning to the Internet to learn a little more about the camera and those crazy numbers.

I fell in love quickly with the way the SP focuses.  It's got a little focus lever that I found made focusing at least twice as fast as with an RC or RD!  In fact, I think the SP is the fastest focusing manual camera I've ever used and it's even faster than some cameras with autofocus.  I was starting to understand why so many street photographers love this camera so much.

Talking of street photography, I figured I should go point this camera at some people on the streets rather than at walls - that is, of course, once I'd figured out the mystery numbers to be Exposure Values (duh! it does say 'EV' next to the numbers).  

I loved every minute of it.  At first though I was reluctant to get close to my subjects.  I had been shooting an SLR (Asahi Pentax Spotmatic) the previous week.  The Pentax is relatively silent for an SLR, but it still makes an audible sound from close up.  So I kept my distance.

The beautiful G. Zuiko f/1.7 lens performed flawlessly in different light conditions - indoors, outdoors in blazing sunlight and so on.  This was no surprise  of course, as I got the same great performance from the lenses on the RC and RD.

Soon enough, I re-adjusted to the silent shutter of a rangefinder, and got closer to my subjects.  Even though the SP is physically larger than the RC and RD, it still has such a small profile that I was able to basically stand next to people and take photos without any reaction at all.



I'm heading to Africa in a couple of weeks or so.  It's now a decision which camera to take with me - the RC, RD, or SP?  At present, the RD is most likely because it's somewhat a compromise between the SP and RC - it's almost as small as the RC, yet its lens is almost as good as the SPs.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

olympus om-1

Image
It was World Photography Day the other day.  I picked the Olympus OM-1 as my camera for the day  mainly because I had recently acquired it. I had also been reading a bit about some photographers of note, such as Jane Brown , that used the OM-1. I was immediately impressed with the size of the thing - so small. I later learnt that it was indeed Olympus' intention to make an SLR smaller than all the existing ones with the giant prisms.  Sound familiar? That is almost exactly what is happening today with the Olympus OMD series. To quote the oracle in Battlestar Gallactica "A ll of this has happened before, and it will happen again ". My copy came with the beautiful Zuiko 50mm f1.8 MC (marcro) lens. I am familair with the Zuiko quality, but when the photos came out, I was blown away. In fact, I commented somewhere that Olympus should have named it the "Olympus OMG!". That's how good it is. The above photo of the minibus was taken in relative
Read more

How to choose your first 35mm film camera

Image
If you're a seasoned digital photographer and you use a ' real ' camera with settings and all that, then you already have all the information you need about picking a film camera. Unless you're looking for something completely different from what you already know, you can stop reading now. Just go buy a film camera, go out and shoot. You'll be fine - you already know how to use a film camera. It's the same beast, except the image is being recorded on a piece of film instead of a digital sensor. Now, for the rest of us beginners, noobs, padawans, young grasshoppers, e.t.c., here are some insights; I use affiliate links in this article from Amazon, KEH and Apple and may be compensated if you purchase via a link. I have not been sponsored by anyone. This article is based solely on my experience as camera enthusiast. Enjoy. What is 35mm Film? "Film", or photographic film refers to a thin sheet of transparent plastic coated with a photo
Read more

boots 500AF - part 1

Image
Much displeased am I to report that my nostalgia project isn’t going as smoothly as I expected. Why is it that in a mostly plastic camera, one of the only metallic parts turned out to be the least durable? The source of my said displeasure is a thin little strip of metal. Thus the story goes. Camera number 3 finally. I was excited about this one, as it was my first ‘good’ camera. Branded ‘Boots 500AF’, it has a 34mm f4.3 autofocus (hence the ‘AF’) lens. Come to think of it, both the 34mm (as opposed to 35mm) and f4.3 (rather than f4) are quite obscure values for a film point and shoot. I have no way of telling, but I assume the ‘500’ in the name denotes the maximum shutter speed of 1/500 the camera can achieve, but that’s pure speculation on my part. It has an auto flash, and the lens does a faux zoom action when turned on. Very cool indeed. I read somewhere that it was a rebranding of some Japanese camera, but again, I have found no evidence of this. Oh how
Read more